🗺 Every page — the whole flow
Should Garland County back growing and sharing food together as public infrastructure — connecting the gardens, the farmers market, gleaning, and schools it already has, and scaling them — the way it backs parks, the library, and water?
Local · Garland County — advisory signal to your county — Quorum Court, a city board, or the school board.
Your answer — fifteen seconds, no account, nothing asked Rules of engagement
Tap an answer. No account, nothing asked — change it anytime while your window is open.
The count so far — aggregate only, always
| Answer | Count |
|---|---|
| Yes | 1 |
| No | 0 |
| Skip | 0 |
1 total · all Tier 0 (open sentiment) · all via web · updates instantly
Who's answering, self-reported (not verified): 0 live in Garland County · 0 work here · 0 have family here · 1 other or unsaid
Every answer moves this bar in real time — including yours. At 2000, the result is printed and hand-delivered.
Tier 0 means open sentiment: it shows how visitors lean, and it is never cited as verified resident opinion. Phone, residency, and voter verification tiers arrive with the full voting layer — and results will always display every tier's count separately.
These counts are unofficial: gathered by an independent community platform, not by any government. This is not an election, a referendum, or a legal petition — its only weight is that the counting is published and checkable.
Plainly: because a Tier 0 answer takes no verification, a determined person can pad this number — that is exactly the weakness the verification tiers (phone, residency, voter-file) are built to close. Until then, treat these as open sentiment, never proof, and weigh the public signatures — real names, by choice — more heavily than the raw count.
Proposed solutions — cited, and voted yes or no
This is where the question turns into proposals. Anyone can file a clear, concise solution moving forward — backed by documents, research, or a worked-out idea, with its sources. Everyone else clicks yes or no. No comment threads: ideas rise on their sources and their count, not on who argues loudest.
Garland already grows food together in places that don’t talk to each other: a student-built community garden at the Hot Springs Welcome Center, a grant-winning school garden at the Hot Springs Child Care Center, and an active Garland County Master Gardener chapter tending the courthouse, Entergy Park, and Garvan. Step one is to network them into one visible program and add more — offering unused public parcels for community gardens through a simple revocable license, the model Newark runs at $1 a year and Baltimore runs for free, so no land is sold. Hot Springs Parks & Rec already keeps pollinator and sculpture gardens on city land, so the precedent for city-supported growing space exists. The know-how is already here and free through the Master Gardeners and the county Extension office. Proven at scale elsewhere: Seattle runs 91 community gardens as a city service since 1973; Brown County, Wisconsin runs 13 through its Extension office. Honest limit: a plot supplements a household’s groceries (a California study estimates ~$435 a season), it does not end anyone’s food insecurity.
→ Read the full brief, with every precedent and the honest limits.
The Historic Hot Springs Farmers Market already runs year-round and already accepts SNAP and WIC — it is the natural hub. Two moves scale it: plug into the statewide Arkansas Gleaning Project (route market and orchard surplus to pantries — call coordinator Brandon Chapman), and add a community fridge or produce-sharing point for daily give-and-take. Project HOPE Food Bank already moves 100,000+ pounds a month to 70+ partner pantries across the region, so the distribution backbone exists — this connects growers to it. Nearly free; the logistics are already running. Honest limits: community fridges are citizen-led mutual aid, not a government program (the Freedge network counted 150+ US fridges in 2021); and whether the market’s past Double Up Food Bucks SNAP-match is still active should be confirmed and, if not, revived.
Garland already has a working model: the Hot Springs Child Care Center runs a raised-bed garden that ~75% of its kids take part in, and it won a 2020–21 Arkansas Garden Grant. Extend that pattern across the school district and to National Park College, whose Helping Hawks pantry is already open to the community (a ready outlet for garden produce, though NPC has no garden yet — an opening). School gardens feed cafeterias and teach kids: Denver’s Garden to Cafeteria put 5,000+ pounds into salad bars at ~250 schools, and USDA’s People’s Garden School Pilot partnered with the University of Arkansas to build school gardens through Extension. The evidence is real but honest about itself — the best systematic review links community gardening to higher fruit-and-vegetable intake while stating plainly that the overall evidence quality is low; we keep that caveat attached.
Garland doesn’t need to build a food policy council from scratch — one already meets in all but name. CHI St. Vincent Hot Springs’ 2025 Community Health Needs Assessment names food insecurity as a priority and convened exactly the right people around it: Project HOPE Food Bank, Arkansas Foodbank, Cooperative Christian Ministries & Clinic, and the Garland County Health Department. The move is to make that group a standing food-access working group that coordinates growers, schools, the market, and the pantries — the cheap, structural piece that keeps the gardens and gleaning from staying one-off projects. Johns Hopkins’ Center for a Livable Future documents that such councils can be housed in an existing body; at least 283 were active across the US as of 2020. The north star — honestly out of a county’s scale, but showing the direction: Belo Horizonte runs a food-as-a-right system at ~2% of its city budget, and Rosario turned vacant land into 2,500 tons of food a year.
Gardens, fridges, and gleaning only ever cost money — so on their own they live and die on grants and volunteers. Garland can put an economic engine underneath them, and it has unusually strong demand to sell into: a food hub (aggregation, cold storage, light processing, delivery) that SELLS local food at market rate to buyers who already pay — Oaklawn’s hotels and restaurants, the two hospitals, National Park College dining, the school district, the tourism restaurant scene — and routes its seconds and surplus to Project HOPE’s pantry network. The selling arm funds the giving arm; grants buy one-time capital (the building, the cooler, the truck), not payroll. It is proven: 91% of US food hubs broke even or better in 2020, institutions spend $130 billion a year on food, and Arkansas’s Medicaid nutrition waiver now opens produce prescriptions as a health-care buyer (the hospital already floated a food-prescription program). Honest limit: food hubs still lean on grants (2025 data) and need a real business operator and three to five years to turn — the slow flywheel, not a quick win. The full cited design is at /engine.
→ Read the full brief, with every precedent and the honest limits.
This does not have to come out of the general fund. The Hot Springs Area Community Foundation already names food insecurity as a funding priority and runs open grant cycles (its fall Giving Tree awards $500–$8,000 to nonprofits, schools, churches, and government agencies). The City of Hot Springs is a federal CDBG entitlement community with its own annual application cycle — a food-access project can qualify. USDA’s Community Food Projects grant funds this work at larger scale (up to $400,000, 1:1 match) through a 501(c)(3) such as Project HOPE Food Bank, Jackson House, or CCMC. Extension and Master Gardener support is already free. Spend this money the durable way — on one-time capital and startup (land prep, a cooler, a truck, first-year coordination that hands off to earned revenue), not on payroll that ends when the grant does (see the engine at /engine). Honest limits: grants are competitive and time-limited and most need a nonprofit applicant and a match — seed money to get a program self-sustaining, not a permanent line. (Note: United Way of the Ouachitas, a longtime local funder, closed in August 2025 — it is not a resource anymore.)
File a solution — clear, concise, cited
Filed solutions are public and screened against the bright lines. Your name isn't attached — it stands on its sources.
Make it count for more — optional, always
Your answer is already counted, anonymously. If you want it to weigh more, tell us who's answering — and, if you like, put your name on it like a petition. All optional.
Answer the question above first — then this opens up.
Put your name on it — optional, petition-style
A registered answer is the kind an official can't wave off. Every field is optional — leave what you like.
The only use of this information, in full: it stays in a private file on our server, separate from the votes, and is never published anywhere — with one exception that is always yours to choose: the announce box puts your name, town, and answer on the question page, until you uncheck it. The one other use — the reason registration exists — is to let a count be verified as real people the way a petition's signatures can be checked: if an official questions whether a result is genuine, we can confirm the registrations behind it are real, and only that. Never sold, never handed to anyone for any other purpose, never used for marketing. Remove yours any time: brayden.ozark@gmail.com.
Signed publicly — the loud version: optional, always
The count above is anonymous and stays that way. Signing is the separate, louder act — your name and your answer, on the page, like a petition on a counter. Answer the question first, then sign it if you want to be heard by name.
Jonathin Shuffield, Arkadelphia — YES 2026-09-12
Signatures are self-given and unverified until the verification tiers arrive. If a signature misuses your name, email brayden.ozark@gmail.com and we will remove it — removals are logged on the public record like everything else.
Share it — a question travels farther than a website
Send a neighbor straight to this question — they land right here, answer in fifteen seconds, done. Text it, post it, print the code for the counter or the church bulletin.
During early access: the site asks for a door code — send it along with the link (you know it if you're reading this). When they enter it, the door opens onto this exact page.
The traction rule: at 2000 responses, the result gets printed and hand-delivered to the relevant body, and the delivery is stamped on the docket. 1 of 2000 and counting — every share moves it.
The context — why this question exists
About one in five people in Garland County are food insecure — Feeding America’s 2023 estimate is ~20% (Aspire Arkansas), and the CHI St. Vincent 2025 Community Health Needs Assessment cites the 2022 figure at 19.6%, with the child rate at 26.2%. Arkansas is the worst-ranked state in the country for food insecurity. Most food help is emergency help, and that work is essential — nothing here replaces it. This question asks about a second, cheaper, more durable thing: whether the county should back growing and sharing food together as public infrastructure. Garland is not starting from zero — it has an active Master Gardener chapter, a year-round SNAP/WIC farmers market, existing school/community gardens, and a regional food bank moving 100,000+ lbs a month — so the real work is to connect and scale them. The full research, with precedents and honest limits, is in Food as a utility.
Disclosures — the platform holds itself to its own standard
This question was opened by the platform’s founder. It is disclosed because the platform names who opens every question.
Bright lines that apply to every question here: no votes on races or on live ballot measures, no campaign language, and nothing aimed at non-elected staff. Elected officials can be named. The raw submission and any wording history are logged in the platform's public repository.